Court grants speedy hearing on terror suspects accused of spying on US, Israeli embassies in Nigeria

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, granted an accelerated hearing in the ongoing trial of three terror suspects, accused of spying on American and Israeli embassies in Nigeria for certain individuals in Iran.

Justice Emeka Nwite made the order following an oral application by prosecuting lawyer, Bello Abu, which was not opposed by defence lawyers.

The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the three men; Haruna Ali Abbas, Ibrahim Hussaini Musa and Adam Suleiman, were arrested in Kano and Lagos States in 2013.

At Wednesday’s hearing, a prosecution witness told the court that Abbas admitted being recruited to spy on the interests of the United States of America and Israel in Nigeria, particularly their embassies.

The witness, a senior official of the State Security Service, SSS, identified as James Simon, disclosed this.

The officer said one of those recruited for the assignment confessed to the act and how he also recruited others.

Simon, who featured as the first prosecution witness (PW-1), was cross-examined on Tuesday by Abbas’ lawyer, Aliyu Yauri.

The witness said he recorded the statement made by Abbas, in which he (Abbas) detailed his involvement in the whole episode and how he helped the Iranians recruit some other Nigerians.

He said from the statement written by Abbas (who is the 1st defendant), Iranian military men trained some Nigerians, particularly the defendants in the act of terrorism.

When asked by Yauri if he would consider the Iranian military men as members of a terrorist group, the witness said although he did not know the military men themselves, “their involvement in such an act (of training Nigerians in the act of terrorism), even if you are not formally branded as a terrorist organisation, still amounts to the act of terrorism.”

On whether the defendants could be called terrorists by merely engaging in military training under the tutelage of Iranian military men, the witness responded in affirmative.

He added: “The act of involvement of non-military personnel in surveillance, recruitment of persons and even weapon handling amount to the act of terrorism.

“The question should be, for what purpose were their training? Why will non-military personnel go outside the shores of the country to get military training?”

Reading from one of Abbas’ statements, the witness noted that the 1st defendant wrote that they were trained by military men, whose names he did not know.

The witness then queried if it was possible for someone to be trained by instructors, “who you don’t know and can’t identify?”

When asked to disclose the mission defendants were to carry out, the witness, reading from Abbas’ statement, said as stated by the 1st defendant, some of the missions they were to carry out are in surveillance, counter-surveillance and information gathering.

“Based on his confession, he said they were to send the names of Israeli and American companies.”

Upon Yauri’s request that the witness tells the court the defendant’s capacity and mission, based on the exhibits before the court, Simon said from Abbas’ statement, he confessed that their training in Iran started with surveillance

He said it also involved how to recruit persons, security of information, open source intelligence, communication and a one-day class on guns handling.

He said Abbas added that they were later taken to a shooting ground in a military barracks in Iran and trained for one day.

The witness also read part of the statement by Abbass where he said “my mission was to send news concerning the American embassy and Israeli embassy locations.”